Community Engagement in Raleigh

Perspective plays a significant role in Raleigh’s relocations. When it comes to commuting, Raleigh doesn’t experience the intense car congestion seen in cities like Atlanta, Houston, or Los Angeles. Based on research, a sizable portion of working Americans consider a 35-minute commute reasonable, as driving to work has been ingrained in daily life for the past 50 years. Many simply accept it as part of their routine.

A key challenge in design is how preference, lifestyle, and evolving needs contribute to functional obsolescence in buildings. Just in the past 5 years, the rise of hybrid work has reshaped apartment developments, leading to the integration of coworking spaces and amenities that were rare or nonexistent 20 years ago. Many urban buildings constructed between 2000 and 2015 weren’t designed for long-term ownership; instead, they were built to be resold, often leaving future owners with maintenance and structural concerns. While high-quality, well-designed buildings exist in downtown’s and remain in strong demand, a significant portion of urban housing is cheaply constructed—leading to the widespread frustration and mockery of vertical living nightmares.

For someone living in a West Coast five-over-one wood-frame apartment without adequate amenities, the transition to a freestanding three-bedroom house 2 feet from a neighbor, but near a park might feel like an upgrade. At certain points in life, the appeal of private space outweighs dense urban living, especially when public amenities are lacking.

Ultimately, successful urban living isn’t just about the buildings—it’s about the neighborhood experience. Public and private amenities like pocket parks, playgrounds, restaurants, and coffee shops play a crucial role in making density desirable.

Much of high-density American development has, whether intentionally or not, been designed in ways that push people toward suburban alternatives, and this neglect of urban spaces has contributed to their diminished appeal. On the flip side, many European cities demonstrate how thoughtful urban planning that prioritizes walkability, transit access, and mixed-use neighborhoods can foster environments where residents prefer urban living because their daily needs are conveniently met within the city.

To wrap up, Raleigh’s future as a top place depends on continuing its commendable urban planning efforts and commitment to densification. Without this, the city risks following the path of many others that embraced suburban sprawl. There’s only one chance to curb outward expansion before it gains irreversible momentum.

7 Likes

some historical Raleigh stuff…in the 70s the state govt in downtown Raleigh made many employees wear a suit and tie to work, for no real visual reason. my dad was in the bottom of the old Administration Bldg. decades later if a state employee rode the bus they got free or discounted fare to their office. in the late 90s my dad could have worked from home, the tech was there…the state govt at that point had spread out offices from downtown, perhaps forward thinking at that time…so all the Wake Forest programmers might not have to drive as far. if in home stuff keeps morning and evening commutes down…good deal.

I’m having a hard time understanding what you’re trying to say, here…

3 Likes

When I was a kid in California, we would sometimes have to pick up my dad from work at IBM when my mother would have the car for the day (we only had one). When 5PM came, we’d sit in the car by his campus entrance and say “There’s Dad” over and over and over because they all looked the same. It was like the march of the penguins in their dark suits and ties. It was a real groovy site though, and I loved going to pick him up so that I got to see the Calisphere.

9 Likes

Found a Census table that shows how many (actually, how few) residents are “longtime homeowners.” As of 2023, the percent of residents who are homeowners who moved in prior to 2000 (i.e., 24+ years ago) in…
Raleigh: 6.7%
Wake County: 8.6%
USA: 14%

I get that it’s unsettling, but… they’re humans. Even if they rationally know that emails coming in aren’t representative of overall public sentiment, it’s impossible to override the emotional response to getting attacked.

4 Likes

Last week, the City of Raleigh voted to disband the Community Engagement Board (the thing that was supposed to replace the old CAC system) due to a lack of clarity in how it’s supposed to operate. I haven’t had the chance to listen to the meeting’s discussions on this, but does anyone have a better idea as to what’s happening and/or what could replace that?

It sounds like the city’s ongoing Comprehensive Plan update involves setting up a citizen’s assembly, but I’m not sure how this relates to that announcement.

If you don't know what a citizen's assembly is, click here!

For those of y’all who don’t know, citizen’s assemblies are kind of like jury duty, except it’s for making laws as opposed to holding a trial about them.

Ireland has done this, most famously, to deal with constitutional problems or sensitive policy debates (e.g. abortion). Similar things have happened in France, Scotland, and surprisingly even Texas. The proposed version for Raleigh seems to involve several citizens being randomly picked, then being paid a $1,000 stipend to show up to meetings where they discuss questions that the city poses. The city, in turn, commits to formally listening to and considering the results of those discussions.

For more questions like the timeline, how that $1k figure was chosen etc., take a look at this city memo!

7 Likes

I agree. At the end of the day, receiving contrarian emails to those from a well organized NIMBY effort gives the council some cover with less political risk. For example, I have zero doubt that our efforts in support of the West/Peace rezoning had an enormous impact on the council’s ability to resist the NIMBYs with confidence. I also believe that our efforts fundamentally damaged Livable Raleigh’s confidence that they had figured out the formula to always getting what they want. Their entire model relied on us doing nothing while they air their grievances.

10 Likes

So, I have been a long term homeowner downtown, but I moved that downtown home in 2005. People sometimes make different decisions based on their circumstances. For me, my first place just become too much for one person and I wanted something more manageable in size. While I am technically not a long term owner by that metric, I only moved 3 blocks and stayed in the same downtown neighborhood.

2 Likes