Or better yet do both
8 Likes
As long as the business of providing housing remains profit driven, you can be assured that new apartment complexes will be geared toward the luxury market. Cost of land compels developers to maximize their rents, and putting luxury finishing touches, spaces, and services into their buildings is how you do it.
The only tool available to mitigate those land costs is to go higher and spread out the land cost per unit over more units. Unfortunately, going higher will also command higher rent dollars as people will pay for views from those higher floors. Itâs quite the conundrum.
7 Likes
Also important to note that you could get away from the higher land costs by building further out. I think our development pattern still revolves around this model.
Well that scenario doesnât work for Raleigh so what do you do now? Conundrum indeed.
3 Likes
Well, for its part, the city can stop building suburban style public housing on expensive city center land. If platforming the car is going to be a defining feature of the public housing that the city builds, then it should be building that further from the city center in a more car centric context.
10 Likes
So my friend lives in Grosvenor Gardens, the complex that the city purchased to âprotect affordable housingâ or something a while back. She said today she got a notice of rent going up 40%.
2 Likes
Did that actually take place, the purchase? I see CASA was actually making the purchase with the city chipping in. Maybe it never took place or itâs still in progress.
1 Like
Wow, Iâm out of the loop but I am surprised to hear those are (were?) remotely affordable. Beautiful buildings in a prime location.
1 Like
I confirmed with her that the CASA purchase did go through at the beginning of the year. The property manager didnât change from VG Murray and Co. Itâs not clear whoâs responsible for the increase yet but she said rent was already adjusted upward in January after the purchase.
Sheâs running it down with both of them. She suspects income-based rent changes, which really doesnât work out for her due to extenuating circumstances. Could also be only certain units are marked for affordable housing (but she is in a studio which was historically below-market).
AFAIK thereâs no legal restrictions about any of this, so asking nicely and then maybe public shaming is about all weâve got.
Appears that enough of the residents complained to warrant them posting a new letter on peopleâs doors:
My friend worked at a non-profit for years and immediately pointed out that non-profits usually do run a deficit, supported by outside donations or government money.
On one hand these units were pretty well below market rates. On the other, isnât that kind of the point? The adjustment, anecdotally from her experience, makes this place not so much better than any other option⌠Her small, old, non-accessible studio is now over $1k.
6 years ago I had a nicer and larger âluxuryâ 1 bedroom for $900 on Centennial. With a washer/dryer! Of course, thatâs 6 years ago.
2 Likes
The cost of everything in America has basically doubled over the last 5 years. Not sure why people would expect housing to be any different.
2 Likes
Well as wages havenât been keeping up over the same amount of time so goes housing affordability.
3 Likes
It seems on reflection that this was kind of a messaging mismatch. If itâs true that the original owners were basically taking a loss to provide affordable rent, but the end had come and the property needed to be sold, then CASA is basically doing damage control with the help of the city by trying to keep the structure itself in place in hopes that it can be maintained stably in the future.
On a larger scale this is probably a win (no teardown and reconstruction, one more ânon-luxuryâ complex still exists) but for existing residents benefitting from low rent which was basically insulated from the market (somehow) it surely feels like a betrayal after the organization got praise for affordability and their rent is going up dramatically.
I feel like it highlights the duality of âaffordable housingâ and how much trouble weâre already in. What CASA is doing is pretty reasonably âaffordable housingâ in respect to trying to stay at the lower end of the market. But the market itself is unaffordable for lots of people. The only way to make rent in this area affordable for most people is to be entirely irrational and âunsustainableâ from the perspective of the market.
5 Likes
WRAL also ran an article on this last night.
1 Like
This is really disturbing and disappointing to read: âhousing deficit of roughly 17,000 unitsâ
https://twitter.com/abc11_wtvd/status/1673488900843610117?s=46&t=SaaEOInxhn1HuxgnOqLbLw
1 Like
Yet just about every new development gets blocked, delayed, and/or reduced in scope by NIMBYs, while at the same time yammering about lack of affordable housing
5 Likes
One of the better videos that Iâve watched lately.
5 Likes
Just watched this and overall itâs pretty good stuff, but could go a bit harder on critiquing each quadrant.
Conservative and Libertarian NIMBYs tend to be anti-transit.
Progressive and Environmentalist NIMBYs tend to use isolated examples of gentrification as a blanket excuse to ban all new development regardless of where it occurs in a city.
It is a rare branch of issues that crosses the usual political lines and I found it pretty interesting.
Thatâs pretty much sums up Mary Black and Jane Harrison. Iâm not wrong they ran there agendas on that.
For the record, my rent for a studio+ apartment in the building at the corner of Ashe and Hillsborough street (literally the outer boundary of downtown) was $595 just 5 years ago. I could even sunbathe or have brunch on the roof outside my kitchen windovw.
For a native, these prices are ridiculous. Sure, we may have gotten a few new developments and storefronts that have opened in the tiime since, but literally nothing has drastically changed about the amount of benefits or amenities downtown Raleigh living has to offer.
Itâs downright distressing to see these numbers for new housing while older places are either getting demolished and replaced, bought and flipped for profit, or gobbled up solely for the purpose short term rentals / tourist housing.
(Bit of a tangent but I hate how in a market suffering from a housing stock shortage, there are several older apartments in cameron village on airbnb that actual citizens could use for long term housing but canât because a single person is renting them all out for short term visitors. Itâs literally maddening and only drives this ridiculous rental price inflation for housing for city citizens! Not a strictly âRaleigh issueâ, but itâs why itâs so hard not to scoff at $1300/mo being a âgood dealâ for renting young professionals. )
Reading â$4000/mo for a 3bd in Raleighâ makes me want to scream.
19 Likes
Tackling the affordable housing crisis would require policies that are outside the purview of anything American politics ever talks about anymore.
3 Likes