Smoky Hollow Park Adjacent Development (West St) Rezoning Z-12-25 approved

I was reminded that the last time we went through this the PC unanimously approved the project, yet CC still rejected it 6-2.

If you’re in Corey Branch’s district (C) I suggest emailing him and everyone in the city limits of Raleigh should also email Stormie.

corey.branch@raleighnc.gov
stormie.forte@raleighnc.gov

Possible content for email:

Dear Council Members,

I am writing in strong support of Rezoning Case Z-12-25 for the parcels at West and Peace Streets. This project has now been unanimously approved by the Raleigh Planning Commission twice, underscoring its alignment with the city’s vision and planning priorities.

The proposed design appropriately follows the City’s “step down” approach, bridging between the 40-story height already approved for Smoky Hollow Phase 3 at Peace and Harrington and the surrounding context. This thoughtful transition supports both growth and neighborhood character.

High-density development belongs in the urban core, especially in locations well-served by amenities and transit. This site is directly across from Publix and within walking distance of numerous businesses, services, and employment centers — exactly where the City’s growth strategy intends for density to be placed.

Z-12-25 is consistent with Raleigh’s comprehensive plan, supports walkability, encourages transit use, and brings additional vitality to a location that can sustain it without displacing established communities. I urge you to approve this rezoning and allow this important project to move forward.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]
[Your Address or Neighborhood, if desired]

19 Likes

Thanks for the template. Email sent :handshake:

4 Likes

Same, thanks and sent.

3 Likes

Thanks. Also sent. I signed my Dylan so that it would carry more weight.

4 Likes

“30-story building 240 feet away from a residential neighborhood is not appropriate.”

I’d like to see a map showing areas of Raleigh that are greater than 240 feet from a residential building. I bet there are so few locations.

6 Likes

this cute 3d model he made is not sending the message i think he wants to send

6 Likes




i think some of this art is new

28 Likes

It blows my mind that the neighborhood is supposedly so worried about shadows that they’d want to turn down the potential new development and park this project would bring. I’m sure the same people complaining about this walk to Publix, restaurants at SH, or work out there.

12 Likes

Hopefully this links to where I want it to start. Listen to this minute or so.
This commissioner nails it on the head when he talks about the context.

2 Likes

Pretty manipulative making it seem like the entire parcel of land will be one giant tower stretching the whole block.

5 Likes

Oh my sweet Mary mother and joseph PLEASE LET THIS BE WHAT THE NORTH ENTRANCE INTO DOWNTOWN BECOMES…

THIS LOOKS LIKE A REAL CITY!!!

26 Likes

By the way, it seems contributing to the park funding is no longer included in the rezoning. The rezoning does specify to add $1.2 million to affordable housing fund instead though.

That seems like a thing to bring back… Especially since the city dropped the ball by removing it from the bond vote.

1 Like

100% blame the City Council on this one. I almost imagine the developer removed that condition as a “F you” to them, knowing that this is still a slam dunk proposal that 100% should be approved, regardless.

2 Likes

I watched much more of the commission meeting & the developer laid out the arguments for the rezoning brilliantly that gave no objective off-ramp to the commissioners to side with the NIMBYs.
Maybe the council will come to the same objective conclusion?

3 Likes

In the meantime, I’ll settle for some trees planted along this stretch of Capital. It’s a pretty depressing mile or so and isn’t befitting a major downtown entrance to one of America’s fastest growing and dynamic cities.

9 Likes

Trees in the center median would be nice, too. There’s so much room there.

7 Likes

Would have to be done in the park land. I am pretty sure the DOT won’t go for it in their ROW due to crash safety.

1 Like

Yeah that’s the argument. We don’t want to lose the character of the light industrial building wasteland…

20 Likes

“we won’t have any sun in the morning”
That it’s in a nutshell. They think that they own their views and access to daylight on their terms alone.