99% Invisible did an episode recently about coverting office buildings to residential. Its an idea that I hear floated pretty often and sometimes get questions about as a structural engineer (I’m not that kind of structural engineer, so I never have much of an answer other than broad strokes, ha). Especially in the post covid, remote/hybrid work world.
I don’t think its really their finest work, but it is nice to see someone at least take a small dive into some of the issues these kinds of projects have to deal with. I think this topic deserved a bit more time and would have loved to see them do a mini series on it.
Anyway, I saw this thread get revived and thought this episode might be interesting to some folks here. Enjoy!
Hi DTR Community,
Please consider attending this event June 6th. Featuring Daniel Herriges, co-author of the latest Strong Towns book Escaping the Housing Trap.
Not sure if anyone has mentioned this already; but the City of Raleigh recently launched a podcast called Big Ideas Raleigh. Seems like a cool idea. Already a few episodes in the stream.
Imagine not using the excuse of not having a robust rail solution while STILL pursuing development that prioritizes the pedestrian. IMO, there’s no reason why Raleigh can’t take learnings from this sort of development. I also appreciate that they are open to modifying their strategy and development model to be inclusive of some cars in a really surgical way.
Traveling across the country this past year, Tempe is one of the only cities I would live in outside of the Raleigh or Durham. It’s fantastic and well connected. Street cars, light rail,10 mins from airport, scenic, and they are creating a walkable community from virtually nothing. Have long thought the culdesac concept would be great for the DMV site.
The Culdesac concept is interesting. I would love for a Raleigh developer to build something like this. Though with a different name. The name is horrible.
Very interesting article about why buildings today are simple and austere, while buildings of the past were ornate and elaborately ornamented. The answer is not the cost of labor.