In the endgame I’d like to see a true HS route constructed between Harrisburg and Sanford, with Charlotte-Raleigh trains using the existing trackage Charlotte-Harrisburg and an upgraded S-line between Sanford and Cary. I’m not suggesting that trains be dropped all along the current route; of course not. But if we really want to achieve Jim Hunt’s original goal of 2 hours flat (or better) between downtown Raleigh and uptown Charlotte, something dramatic has to be done.
In like, 2075 or whatever, I still think a great development would ultimately be a more direct high-speed greenfield route between Raleigh and Charlotte that roughly follows NC-64 and then NC-49. Then run more regional trains from Siler City(?)/Pittsboro to Raleigh. And include the zoo stop on the way to CLT!!
I know there are good arguments against this - but I am also for the greenfield route. Run the trains in a triangle, Ral/CLT/Grns and reversed. But I think that a new line would be a big boost for the whole SEHSR from DC to somewhere in suburban ATL
I think 2 hours is possible on an upgraded NCRR with:
- The curviest segments realigned - looking at you Orange and Alamance. NCDOT has plans already drawn up to accomplish this.
- Dedicated higher-speed (125mph) third track for portions of the line between Greensboro and Charlotte
- Electrification
- Lastly, a super express stopping pattern. Raleigh-Greensboro-Charlotte.
Perhaps so, but I wonder about the cost of completely eliminating grade crossings through so many towns and raising bridges for catenary compared to building a virgin line through the middle of nowhere in central NC. That’s the approach taken by the French and the Japanese, except for terminal trackage.
If we are dreaming I prefer no stops between Raleigh and Charlotte and 200mph+ like Asian countries. It’s only 130 miles straight line distance. That would be truly transformative
Is Durham-Greensboro supposed to eventually be double-tracked? That project would address most of the remaining grade crossings between Raleigh and Charlotte. There aren’t a lot of grade crossings between Charlotte and Greensboro other than passing through the middle of various small cities/towns along that corridor (which probably necessitate lower train speeds anyway).
I agree that a Raleigh-Charlotte nonstop line would be awesome, but politically, and practically, modernizing the line through Greensboro should come first, because it’s a smaller project, pulls in the Triad, and delivers lots of side benefits in terms of enabling better regional service.
I counted public grade crossings between Cary and the Charlotte station. There are 112. Of course, there used to be a lot more but the low-hanging fruit has already been picked.
If the endgame is 90 mph between Cary and Charlotte, we don’t have to close a large number of those. But if the endgame is 125+ mph with electrification, most of those crossings will have to be closed and many of them replaced by bridges. Because of the ROW requirements for bridge construction, that would be a massively expensive program and also very controversial in small towns that straddle the NCRR. Those small towns carry a lot of weight at the General Assembly.
Note that the lease agreement between NS and NCRR specifically says NS will not dispatch the lines if the speed limit exceeds 90.
I dont think raising the speed limit past 90 for the entire corridor is feasible at all, choosing the right segments to build dedicated 125(?) mph passenger-only tracks, and electrification to get up to speed quickly on those segments, could cut quite a bit of time off of the schedule. They’ve been planning a big realignment between Durham and Hillsborough since the ARRA stimulus for example.
Mixed-mode electrification and diesel is doable but there are tradeoffs. The Amtrak/Metro-North P32AC-DMs use third-rail 750V DC (definitely not in the cards here) and can’t run on electricity for more than 10 minutes at a time. Supposedly the new Siemens SC-42DMs on order will not have the time restriction and, unlike the P32AC-DMs, will be able to run at 125 mph regardless of power source. They don’t use pantographs, however, and given the distances I assume electrification in NC would use overhead 12.5 kV AC. It’s unclear to me that the 750V DC third-rail can supply enough power to feed the SC-42DMs at 125.
How well the SC-42DMs will work in service is anyone’s guess. The ALC-42s and SC-42/44s have been a real disappointment in terms of reliability.
The grade crossing at Rogers Lake Rd in Kannapolis is being replaced by a bridge, although it’s taking forever to finally complete construction. Imo, Webb Rd between China Grove and Salisbury is one of the last grade crossings between Charlotte and Greensboro where a bridge could be easily justified. Most of the remaining ones throughout that section are around the center of small towns and cities, and I don’t think it’s worth trying to eliminate most of those crossings. I didn’t count the number of grade crossings (112 sounds right) but it looked to me like most of the ones that make sense to close/bridge over are between Greensboro and Durham, not to mention a lot of that section is still just single tracked.
As I understand it, the FRA requires that for 110-125 mph there must be “full width barriers capable of absorbing the impact of highway vehicles.” Those aren’t your standard gates, not even four-quadrant gates. Above 125 mph, FRA says to “close or grade separate ALL highway-rail crossings” [emphasis added].
You could dodge the requirement by slowing to 109 mph at grade crossings. I believe this is one reason why Raleigh-Petersburg is set for 110 mph max (maintaining track to Class VI standards instead of Class VII is another).
I think you’re right that most of the problem exists between Greensboro and Cary.
This new N&O article states that the Siemens plant in Lexington will be supplying the Carolinian with Aero trainsets by 2028, and the Piedmont with Aero trainsets by 2032.
As the Aero trainsets come into service, Amfleet cars will become available. I wonder if the Piedmonts will receive some of them as an interim measure.
Asheville Intercity Bus Service Surpasses 10,000 Riders Since Relaunch
Seems like a good sign for future passenger rail. I do wish that the state would invest more in intercity buses as there is probably a lot of untapped potential there, especially with proper branding and not contracting through Greyhound.